Indeed that x-plane market is smaller compared to p3d/fsx. This might be a key question to avoid hard adaptaion work after every X-Plane new version.
#SKYMAXX PRO 3.2 CODE#
In this regard the question is if it is possible to transfer model code between MSFS/P3D and X-Plane 11 and how labor intensive it might be.Īnother interesting question is, how much independency from X-Plane code restrictions can a model developer reach.
#SKYMAXX PRO 3.2 LICENSE#
Looking at the whole global market today, technology transfer agreements (or license ) are in small companies on the agenda. Hi, X-Plane is indeed a smaller market with lower winning marché.
Sure, i cant say any about long future, but now - i look like this. So, if you (as example) spend time/money for some product development and have 100% $ out, do you want spend the same to get 20% $ out result? This is a BIG quest.Īnother hard thing - it is not easy to code X-Plane API (really need know some tricks direct from LR) and not easy to rework product every new XP version.Īs result, if FF will bring more advanced 320 (compare, or better than FSLabs) to X-Plane market soon, FSLabs not have good marketing situation to do the same for close time period. Sure, great "MSFS/P3D" companies always know one hard thing - X-Plane 11 market is about 15-20% of MSFS/P3D market (my own view, only), but time/money invest for one product about the same. I am on skype with Lefteris (FSLabs leader now, PMDG leader in past). If Eugeny is looking to join us, feel free to drop him a note to ask him to send us an email about it." They wrote: "We are a small team and going into X-Plane is not feasible for us at the moment. Among other issues and on the background of the announced FF A320 model I asked them what about about a win win cooperation between them and JAR Design. Last week I had an interesting correspondence with FSLabs.
0 kommentar(er)
